News Technology

Is the California government against Tesla Self driving claims? What is the fact behind it?

Is the California government against Tesla Self driving claims? What is the fact behind it?

As reported by LA Times, a vigorous investigation is going on Tesla over CEO Elon Musk’s plucky claims about the company’s full Self-Driving technology by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. The news came into the limelight just after a week. Tesla engineers discreetly concede to the DMV that the MUSK has exaggerated the FSD system capabilities on social media. 

Tesla brushed with a lethal crash at a Southern California freeway last week due to running on an air pilot mode before the smash, in accordance to the California Patrol. It crashed on May 5 in Fontana city, 50 miles east of Los Angeles, and is under investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. This scrutiny is the 29th case involving Tesla that the confederate agency has examined. 

What does CHP mention?

The CHP stated on Thursday, that the prelude investigation had figured that Tesla’s halfway automated driving system called Autopilot “was engaged” before the wreck. Moreover, on Friday, the agency coming back to its final declaration to explain their new PHP statement that says that “There has not been a final determination made as to what driving mode the Tesla was in or if it was a contributing factor to the crash.“

FSD assures to convert lanes in freeway traffic and take self exits to stop the traffic signs and lights on its own. But, it does not make them fully autonomous! Tesla vehicles are currently operating at level 2 autonomy, director of Autopilot software CJ Moore converse DMV investigators on March 9. ( teleconference call) 


As mentioned, the ratio of driver interaction would need to be in the expanse of one or two million miles per driver interaction to move into a higher degree of automation. ” A memo obtained by a plain site obtained regarding the meeting reads. “Tesla indicated that Elon is extrapolating on the rates of improvement when speaking about L5 capabilities. Tesla couldn’t say if the rate of improvement turns to L5 by the end of the calendar year.”

The law of California states that the blame for any such accidents or damages will be on the person who is behind the wheel. Also, DMV declared that it has the authority to take charge of an automobile company that has deceived its customers under the Lanham act. These penalties will include the adjournment of Tesla’s vehicles. 

About the author


Kristi Lopez

Kristi Lopez is working as a professional news editor at The Next Hint, Inc. She is accustomed to finding daily reports. Therefore, this keen working and addiction towards her work, it helps her to find good news.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe us

Please wait...
Want to be notified when our article is published? Enter your email address and name below to be the first to know.
error: Content is protected !!